THERE'S A REVIEW by R. Dean Anderson of James D. G. Dunn (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to St. Paul�(Cambridge: �Cambridge University Press, 2003) in Bryn Mawr Classical Review (via Rogue Classicism). He doesn't like it:

In sum, despite several interesting and well thought-out chapters, I cannot see where this book really has a place. It serves neither its intended audience nor can it suffice as a student's textbook.