Fireworks start melee at Nazareth shrineThis was really playing with fire and it's fortunate that it didn't turn out even worse.
AMY TEIBEL
Associated Press
NAZARETH, Israel -An Israeli couple, joined by a young woman reported to be their daughter, entered one of Christianity's holiest sites on Friday and set off a series of small explosions, sparking a riot that left six people wounded in this Arab town in northern Israel.
The family's motives were unclear, but police said they had been treated for psychiatric problems in the past and faced the possibility of losing custody of their children.
Although the attack did not appear to be nationalistic, it underscored the tensions between Israel's Jewish majority and its Arab minority. Israeli Arabs, who make up about 20 percent of the population, complain of systematic discrimination.
Police said the three entered the Basilica of the Annunciation Friday evening and set off firecrackers and other small explosives. Church officials said the site was unguarded, and witnesses said the explosives were hidden in a baby stroller.
[...]
The church is at the site where Christians believe the Angel Gabriel appeared before the Virgin Mary and foretold the birth of Jesus.
Nazareth, the boyhood town of Jesus, is inhabited by Christian and Muslim Arabs, and religious tensions have boiled over in the past, with the two sides in a dispute over attempts to build a mosque next to the church.
[...]
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.
E-mail: paleojudaica-at-talktalk-dot-net ("-at-" = "@", "-dot-" = ".")
Saturday, March 04, 2006
FIRECRACKERS IN NAZARETH CHURCH:
"LUSTY AND SURE-FOOTED": The Charlotte Observer has a detailed report on the choral performance inspired by the Dead Sea Scrolls:
Choral group pays homage to Scrolls
On the fringes of uptown's CIAA festivities, Carolina Voices tucked itself away in St. Peter's Episcopal Church: near in location, but far removed in spirit. The choral group paid homage to the Dead Sea Scrolls, a few of whose fragments were right next door in a show at Discovery Place.
[...]
MADONNA is rumored to be looking to invest in some prime Israeli real estate:
Old shack will give Madonna front-row seat for arrival of her MessiahThe story seems to have originated in the Hebrew publication Yedioth Ahronoth. Another article reports that:
From Ian MacKinnon, in Jerusalem (The Times of London)
MADONNA is trying to buy a house overlooking the Sea of Galilee at the place where followers of her Kabbalist faith expect the Messiah to reappear to herald world peace.
Representatives of the 47-year-old US singer have been cold calling home-owners in the picturesque mountain retreat of Rosh Pina and offering to pay any price to secure a property on her behalf.
[...]
Yedioth Ahronoth said that the owner of a 100-year-old, ramshackle five-bedroom villa overlooking the Sea of the Galilee had been recently contacted several times by representatives of the superstar with a view to selling his property.If the rumor is true, I imagine this will be good for tourism.
According to the same source, Madonna wants to renovate the building into a center of study of mystical Jewish texts pored over by Kabbalah followers.
[...]
THE SITE OF THE MUSEUM OF TOLERANCE is associated with a gruesome ancient episode according to the Jerusalem Post:
Massacre at MamillaThe quotation is from historian James Parkes.
By GIL ZOHAR
Completely overlooked in the current media frenzy about building the Museum of Tolerance atop the millennium-old Ma'amun Allah Cemetery is the site's forgotten history as the killing field of 614.
In that year, nearly three centuries of prosperity under the Byzantine empire were shattered by Persia's Sassanid Shah Khosrau II, known as Parvez - the Victorious.
Local Jews together with their co-religionists in Babylonia allied with the Zoroastrian invaders to defeat the Christian rulers. Seeking revenge for generations of persecution, the Jews destroyed hundreds of churches and monasteries.
[...]
"Once Jerusalem was in Persian hands a terrible massacre of Christians took place, and the Jews are accused of having taken the lead in this massacre. It would not be surprising if the accusation were true, even though the fantastic stories told of Jewish revenge by Christian chroniclers are certainly exaggerated."
How many Christian prisoners of war were murdered by the Mamilla Pool? A precise number is of course now impossible to verify, but Israeli archaeologist Ronny Reich puts the tally at 60,000 before the Persian military stopped the carnage.
[...]
Friday, March 03, 2006
SNOW AT ST. MARY'S COLLEGE:
I took this picture this morning. We don't get much snow in St. Andrews, but much of what we do get comes in the first half of March. According to tradition, the thorn tree on the left was planted by Mary Queen of Scots.
I took this picture this morning. We don't get much snow in St. Andrews, but much of what we do get comes in the first half of March. According to tradition, the thorn tree on the left was planted by Mary Queen of Scots.
GILLES QUISPEL - 1916-2006
I am very sorry to relay the following news from Jack Sasson's Agade list:
Professor Quispel was almost 90 years old. And as I noted here recently, another renowned specialist in Gnosticism, R. McL. Wilson, just celebrated his 90th birthday. It seems that Gnosis is good not only for the soul, but also for the constitution.
UPDATE: J. P. van de Giessen has a long post about Quispel in Dutch at the Aantekeningen bij de Bijbel blog. (Via a comment at Hypotyposeis.)
I am very sorry to relay the following news from Jack Sasson's Agade list:
From a subscriber to the biblical-studies@yahoogroups.com:Requiescat in pace.
======================
Dutch newspapers are reporting the death yesterday of Gilles Quispel (May 30, 1916) the Gnostic scholar and emeritus professor of Early Christianity at Utrecht. He died of pneumonia, reportedly in an Egyptian hospital.
For information about him, see the Dutch Wikipedia, where his death is also reported.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_Quispel.
Professor Quispel was almost 90 years old. And as I noted here recently, another renowned specialist in Gnosticism, R. McL. Wilson, just celebrated his 90th birthday. It seems that Gnosis is good not only for the soul, but also for the constitution.
UPDATE: J. P. van de Giessen has a long post about Quispel in Dutch at the Aantekeningen bij de Bijbel blog. (Via a comment at Hypotyposeis.)
THE LIVRES DE PAROLE EXHIBITION in Paris is reviewed by David Tresilian in Al Ahram:
Canons of monotheism
David Tresilian reviews the exhibition Livres de Parole: Torah, Bible, Coran (Books of Speech: the Torah, the Bible and the Qur'an) at the Bibliothèque nationale de France in Paris
Torah, Bible and Qur'an : "In the long history of l'homo religiosus," writes the curator in the catalogue to the exhibition Livres de Parole: Torah, Bible, Coran (Books of Speech: the Torah, the Bible and the Qur'an) currently at the Bibliothèque nationale de France in Paris, "monotheism is a recent development, bringing about a veritable revolution in the relationship between the gods and man."
[...]
COPTIC GOSPEL OF JUDAS WATCH:
You can read the passage by Irenaeus at the Gospel of Judas page over at Peter Kirby's Early Christian Writings website. It remains to be seen whether Irenaeus' Gospel of Judas is the same as the Coptic one.
And here's a preview of Robinson's new book:
Expert doubts 'Gospel of Judas' revelationI'm glad the press is getting this message out a little more clearly.
By Richard N. Ostling, The Associated Press
NEW YORK — An expert on ancient Egyptian texts is predicting that the Gospel of Judas— a manuscript from early Christian times that's nearing release amid widespread interest from scholars — will be a dud in terms of learning anything new about Judas.
James M. Robinson, America's leading expert on such ancient religious texts from Egypt, predicts in a new book that the text won't offer any insights into the disciple who betrayed Jesus. His reason: While it's old, it's not old enough.
"Does it go back to Judas? No," Robinson told The Associated Press on Thursday.
[...]
Robinson has not seen the text that National Geographic is working on, but assumes it is the same work assailed by Bishop Irenaeus of Lyons around A.D. 180.
Irenaeus said the writings came from a "Cainite" Gnostic sect that jousted against orthodox Christianity. He also accused the Cainites of lauding the biblical murderer Cain, the Sodomites and Judas, whom they regarded as the keeper of secret mysteries.
[...]
You can read the passage by Irenaeus at the Gospel of Judas page over at Peter Kirby's Early Christian Writings website. It remains to be seen whether Irenaeus' Gospel of Judas is the same as the Coptic one.
And here's a preview of Robinson's new book:
In The Secrets of Judas, a HarperSanFrancisco book on sale April 1, Robinson will describe secretive maneuvers in the United States, Switzerland, Greece and elsewhere over two decades to sell the "Judas" manuscript.
He writes that he was approached about purchasing a group of manuscripts in 1983 and arranged for colleague Stephen Emmel, now at the University of Muenster, Germany, to meet in Geneva with go-betweens for the owner.
Emmel got a glimpse of the text but didn't know it was the Gospel of Judas till years later. He was told the original asking price was $10 million but it could be obtained for $3 million, an impossibly high figure for the interested Americans.
From there, Robinson traces a twisted sales trail through years and continents to this year's impending release.
[...]
Thursday, March 02, 2006
PHOENICIAN TEMPLE DISCOVERED:
Phoenician temple found in Sicily
Site believed to be 'unique', archaeologists say
(ANSA) - Palermo, February 28 - An ancient Phoenician temple unearthed in Sicily is "unique" in the West, the head of the Italian dig team claims .
"You have to go all the way to Amrit in Syria to find a similar one," said Lorenzo Nigro of the Rome University team .
[...]
Motya - whose name means "wool-spinning centre" - was founded in the 8th century BC, about a century after the foundation of the most famous Phoenician colony in the ancient world, Carthage in Tunisia .
[...]
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
DA VINCI CODE REVIEW: I finally got around to reading The Da Vinci Code last fall. (I borrowed Grant Macaskill's copy, which he had bought from a charity shop, so both of us avoided the defilement of giving Dan Brown money.) The book has been in the news a good bit lately because of both the lawsuit and the upcoming movie. I've finally finished this brief review, which is so late that it's timely again. Warning: there are some spoilers below.
The book is fun. The writing is lousy, but the plot is well constructed and Brown keeps you guessing and wanting to know what comes next. Robert Langdon and Sophie Neveu are sympathetic characters and I usually wanted things to come out well for them (but see below). Intellectually the book is a couple of notches above, say, The Mummy movie, but it gets too full of itself with its bogus scholarly pretensions. In The Mummy, when Evelyn (Rachel Weitz) starts to blither about "Bambridge scholars" one can't help but cringe, but at least Rachel Weitz is good to look at, and we know anyway that before she gets out more than a few sentences brigands will come crashing through the door waving their scimitars and shooting the place up. (Then Evelyn will take a scimitar off of one of them and kill him with it. The bad guys will have machine guns and the good guys only revolvers, but nevertheless the baddies will miss completely and Evelyn's husband, Rick [Brendan Fraser], and her brother, Jonathan [John Hannah], will pick off numerous baddies. Also, at least once during the battle one or more goodies will leap through a glass window without getting a scratch.)
Unfortunately, Brown fails to follow this principle of administering his fake scholarship in small doses relieved by vigorous bouts of action. Rather, pages 304 to 367 or thereabouts consist of nonstop pseudo-intellectual drivel and well before I got to page 367 I was longing for Silas to burst in and shoot them all down so they would shut up.
Now in one sense, I don't hold this idiocy against Brown any more than I hold it against The Mummy. They're both just stories and even though both are badly done, they're lots of fun. I do hold against him the pretty explicit claim that the historical evidence he presents in the book is real. Notably, the opening page lists as "Fact" that "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate." This just isn't so. He tries to get around this in the common questions page on his website, but not with great success:
This isn't correct. For example, he has the Dead Sea Scrolls containing "Gnostic Gospels" and calls the Scrolls "Christian records" (p. 351). Kindly show me a Gnostic Gospel among the Dead Sea Scrolls.
I don't want to belabor the historical inaccuracies in the book here, since they've been covered very thoroughly many times elsewhere. But for more information see here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here.
The bad thing about the book is that many people will read it and think the ridiculous claims in it are true -- and Brown himself is partly to blame for this and he could have mitigated the problem instead of making it worse. The good thing is that it has gotten a lot of people interested in the Bible and in actual ancient Jewish and Christian history and that may lead some of them to learn more from reputable sources. Plus, it's an amusing read.
The book is fun. The writing is lousy, but the plot is well constructed and Brown keeps you guessing and wanting to know what comes next. Robert Langdon and Sophie Neveu are sympathetic characters and I usually wanted things to come out well for them (but see below). Intellectually the book is a couple of notches above, say, The Mummy movie, but it gets too full of itself with its bogus scholarly pretensions. In The Mummy, when Evelyn (Rachel Weitz) starts to blither about "Bambridge scholars" one can't help but cringe, but at least Rachel Weitz is good to look at, and we know anyway that before she gets out more than a few sentences brigands will come crashing through the door waving their scimitars and shooting the place up. (Then Evelyn will take a scimitar off of one of them and kill him with it. The bad guys will have machine guns and the good guys only revolvers, but nevertheless the baddies will miss completely and Evelyn's husband, Rick [Brendan Fraser], and her brother, Jonathan [John Hannah], will pick off numerous baddies. Also, at least once during the battle one or more goodies will leap through a glass window without getting a scratch.)
Unfortunately, Brown fails to follow this principle of administering his fake scholarship in small doses relieved by vigorous bouts of action. Rather, pages 304 to 367 or thereabouts consist of nonstop pseudo-intellectual drivel and well before I got to page 367 I was longing for Silas to burst in and shoot them all down so they would shut up.
Now in one sense, I don't hold this idiocy against Brown any more than I hold it against The Mummy. They're both just stories and even though both are badly done, they're lots of fun. I do hold against him the pretty explicit claim that the historical evidence he presents in the book is real. Notably, the opening page lists as "Fact" that "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate." This just isn't so. He tries to get around this in the common questions page on his website, but not with great success:
HOW MUCH OF THIS NOVEL IS TRUE?
The Da Vinci Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction. While the book's characters and their actions are obviously not real, the artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals depicted in this novel all exist (for example, Leonardo Da Vinci's paintings, the Gnostic Gospels, Hieros Gamos, etc.). These real elements are interpreted and debated by fictional characters. While it is my belief that some of the theories discussed by these characters may have merit, each individual reader must explore these characters' viewpoints and come to his or her own interpretations. My hope in writing this novel was that the story would serve as a catalyst and a springboard for people to discuss the important topics of faith, religion, and history.
BUT DOESN'T THE NOVEL'S "FACT" PAGE CLAIM THAT EVERY SINGLE WORD IN THIS NOVEL IS HISTORICAL FACT?
If you read the "FACT" page, you will see it clearly states that the documents, rituals, organization, artwork, and architecture in the novel all exist. The "FACT" page makes no statement whatsoever about any of the ancient theories discussed by fictional characters. Interpreting those ideas is left to the reader.
This isn't correct. For example, he has the Dead Sea Scrolls containing "Gnostic Gospels" and calls the Scrolls "Christian records" (p. 351). Kindly show me a Gnostic Gospel among the Dead Sea Scrolls.
I don't want to belabor the historical inaccuracies in the book here, since they've been covered very thoroughly many times elsewhere. But for more information see here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here.
The bad thing about the book is that many people will read it and think the ridiculous claims in it are true -- and Brown himself is partly to blame for this and he could have mitigated the problem instead of making it worse. The good thing is that it has gotten a lot of people interested in the Bible and in actual ancient Jewish and Christian history and that may lead some of them to learn more from reputable sources. Plus, it's an amusing read.
"THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAIL." The details are nearly all wrong, but somehow that doesn't seem to matter in this case. The London Times has an informative article:
(Heads up, Grant Macaskill.)
UPDATE: Also in the Times, Magnus Linklater sums up the situation nicely:
Read it all.
Da Vinci judge turns back to page oneMy favorite bit was this:
By Alan Hamilton
The devil is in the detail, and one reading of the two hefty books in question proves insufficient
DID Pepin the Fat assassinate King Dagobert II in AD679? Why did the Knights Templar fall out with the Priory of Sion in 1188? And was the Crucifixion a fake?
Early Christian history dominated the second day yesterday of the hearing in the High Court into whether the American author Dan Brown had infringed copyright by lifting ideas from a book published more than 20 years previously for his blockbusting fiction, The Da Vinci Code, written in 2003.
Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh are suing their publishers, Random House, for breach of copyright, saying that Brown took at least 15 core ideas from their non-fiction work, The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail, written in 1982. It was the turn of the defence yesterday to deny the claims and, as ever, the devil was in the detail.
[...]
At this stage Mr Justice Peter Smith interjected from the bench. “It’s not surprising, given what happened in 1187.” The court was briefly silenced. “The loss of the kingdom of Jerusalem, thanks to their stupid master,” the judge explained. Knowing nods all round.Right. 1187. Of course. This judge seems to be the right man for the job.
(Heads up, Grant Macaskill.)
UPDATE: Also in the Times, Magnus Linklater sums up the situation nicely:
This then must be the dilemma for those who seek to defend their own versions of made-up history: they can only sue and win if they can demonstrate that their ideas are fictional, invented and therefore entirely their own property. If, on the other hand, they succeed in proving that their research is genuine, and their investigations firmly based, then they have made a signal contribution to history — a history that belongs to us all. Their revelations become as public as the secrets of the Enigma Code, the Suez pact, or the British presidency of the European Union.
Read it all.
THE LAST CATO -- Here we go again! Professor David Maltsberger of the Baptist University of the Américas e-mails a heads-up:
This is the first I've heard of it.
Be watching for the big splash surrounding "The Last Cato"
(http://www.thelastcato.com/) [out in March/April] a DaVinci Code knock-off that features a Vatican paleographer-nun, the Coptic archaeologist with whom she falls in love, and a high placed Swiss Guard with a dirty secret all plumbing the depths of the Staurofilakes (keepers of the True Cross) theft of holy relics by following the secrets hidden in Dante's "Purgatory".
Having just finished an advanced copy, while the storyline is on par with Brown's book as far as readability, the author's confusion over the relationships between classical, Koine, and Byzantine Greek is obvious. A few wild theological interpretations of NT theology and early church history will also no doubt create a wide array of "The Truth Behind the Last Cato" books. Too, when the key historical text of the Staurofilakes is found by our heroes in a basket of cast-off manuscripts ready to be burned at Santa Katrina a la Tischendorf, informed readers will chortle with delight. Assuming the horrific errors in Greek case endings are edited out in the final edition along with transliterated rather than translated geographic names from the Italian original, "The Last Cato" makes an enjoyable, although eye-rolling, late night read will pump new life into Dante's flea-bitten soul.
This is the first I've heard of it.
COPTIC GOSPEL OF JUDAS WATCH:
But it's still cool.Theologians say Judas gospel adds little
ROME, Feb. 27 (UPI) -- Roman Catholic theologians say that the "Gospel of Judas," a version of Christ's life from the point of view of his betrayer, has no effect on theology.
[...]
SANLI URFA (known in antiquity as "Edessa"), the city that gave us the Syriac language, has its own newsletter, the Urfa Times. The current issue has a brief article on the city's history.
THE PIYYUT IS "IN" IN ISRAEL:
The Piyyut is Jewish Soul Music
Basmat Hazan Arnoff (Zeek)
Translated from the Hebrew by Stephen Hazan Arnoff
Reveal Yourself my Dearest, And spread over me Your canopy of peace. Let the earth shine with Your glory, Let us rejoice in You. Make haste, my Love, for the time has come; Show me Your favor as in the days of old.
(Excerpted from the traditional Shabbat liturgical prayer Yedid Nephesh by Eliezer Azikri, 16th-17th century)
My father is a professor of piyyut, Jewish liturgical poetry. For years my family and I joked with him that no more than maybe three and a half people had ever read any of his books. We liked to needle him that while all of his buddies in the academy got invited to all kinds of public events and lectures and were interviewed by the media, he had chosen such a bizarre field of study that no one would ask him to speak anywhere, except for, maybe, the ones that had absolutely no choice. Even us kids never made it very far past the dedications on the first page.
At an event three months ago celebrating the launch of the new website Invitation to Piyyut I understood that something had dramatically changed in how the Jewish community, at least in Israel, relates to this complex, beautiful and little-understood art form.
[...]
What is the piyyut?. The term is derived from the Greek word "poietes" meaning "creator." Using this definition the classical midrashic collection Leviticus Rabba honored 3rd century sages Rabbi Eleazar and Rabbi Shimon by calling them "poietes" – "creators." During the period of Late Antiquity and onward, as the much of Jewish poetic writing became related in some way to synagogue worship, the term piyyut came to mean a Jewish liturgical poem specifically. With the revival of Hebrew as a spoken language in the 19th century, the definition of piyyut received a more general meaning, namely any type of written expression in high, classical language. Sometimes the word piyyut even described any expression that was particularly moving or artistically profound. Contemporary proponents of piyyut tend to define it as liturgical poetry that is actually sung. Thus the word "paytan" – or one who "creates" a piyyut – refers both to the writer and/or composer of a piyyut as well as the actual singing performer of a piyyut.
[...]
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
THE LINE OF MENELIK is alive and well and one member of it is lecturing in Florida:
Member of Ethiopian royalty to speak on legacy of dynastyThe legend of the origin of the Ethiopian royal dynasty is recounted in the Kebra Negast, the national epic of Ethiopia.
Prince thought to be `seed of Messiah'
By Gregory Lewis
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Posted February 28 2006
The grandson of Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie I will speak at two South Florida universities this week.
His Imperial Highness Prince Ermias Sable-Selassie, president of the Ethiopian Crown Council, is one of the grandsons of the late Ethiopian emperor whom Rastafarians consider the Messiah.
The prince, 45, is a key spokesman for the Ethiopian Royal Family, now in exile.
[...]
Prince Ermias will speak today at Florida International University and on Thursday at the University of Miami. He will address "The Enduring Legacy of a Solomonic Dynasty in Ethiopia."
[...]
LATE FOR CHRISTMAS, but timed to coincide with the publication of his latest book, this article in the Wisconsin State Journal interviews New Testament scholar John Dominic Crossan:
Lots of interesting thoughts in this one.
Vetting the Jesus parable
JAY RATH
For the State Journal
Contact Jay Rath at daybreak@madison.com.
Jesus was not born in Bethlehem.
There was no manger, no star, no Wise Men. Mary was not a virgin.
But that doesn't mean it's not all true.
John Dominic Crossan, often called the premier expert on the words and life of the historical Jesus, says the truth of the Christmas story is spiritual, not necessarily factual.
[...]
Crossan is professor emeritus of Biblical Studies at DePaul University in Chicago. He is the author of many books, including "Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography" and "The Historical Jesus." Tuesday will see publication of "The Last Week: A Day by Day Account of Jesus' Last Week in Jerusalem," written with Marcus J. Borg. Crossan's "Jesus and Paul" will be published next fall.
[...]
Lots of interesting thoughts in this one.
MORE DA VINCI CODE STUFF -- Beliefnet has a FAQ on relevant matters:
Ancient Christianity: Quick FactsThe questions are:
Answers to questions raised by 'The Da Vinci Code'
By Marcie Lenk
- Was Jesus Married?
Who was Mary Magdalene? - What is Gnosticism?
- Were there other gospels not included in the Christian Bible?
- Why were these gospels not included?
- What is the feminine divine in Christianity?
Monday, February 27, 2006
THE SBL PSEUDEPIGRAPHA SECTION will be devoting one of its sessions to issues raised in my book (see the ad to the right). Here's the call for papers:
Call For Papers: Up to four separate sessions will be sponsored in 2006. A thematic panel on 4 Ezra and a joint session with the new Religious Experience in Early Judaism & Christianity program unit have pre-arranged rosters of presenters. New paper proposals that treat methodological, historical, literary, or terminological issues surrounding the determination of the cultural provenance of parabiblical literature are especially encouraged, particularly those that interact with points raised in James R. Davila's recent *The Provenance of the Pseudepigrapha: Jewish, Christian, or Other?* (Leiden: Brill, 2005). New paper proposals devoted to the study of any aspect of Jewish pseudepigrapha are also welcome.The deadline is 1 March, so it's not too late to have a go at me!
HAYIM TADMOR receives a long obituary in The Independent:
Hayim Tadmor(Via the Agade list.)
Historian of the Bible and Ancient Near East who established an international centre of Assyriology
Published: 27 February 2006
Hayim Frumstein (Hayim Tadmor), Assyriologist: born Harbin, China 18 November 1923; Professor, Department of Assyriology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1971-93; married 1953 Miriam Skura (one son, one daughter); died Jerusalem 11 December 2005.
Hayim Tadmor was until his retirement in 1993 Professor of Assyriology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the first holder of the post, in a department which he created. A man of enormously wide learning in bible and Ancient Near Eastern history, he stood in the first rank of Assyriologists of his day. Among his many publications, The Inscriptions of Tiglath-pileser III King of Assyria (1994) stands as a fitting memorial.
[...]
OPUS DEI STRIKES BACK -- WITH A BLOG!
I'm not making this up: A priest from Opus Dei has set up a blog to respond to The Da Vinci Code:
(Via Observatório BÃblico.)
I'm not making this up: A priest from Opus Dei has set up a blog to respond to The Da Vinci Code:
Da Vinci Code & Opus DeiThat strikes me as rather more constructive than, say, rioting and carrying around signs calling for people to be beheaded. But that's just me, I guess.
(Via Observatório BÃblico.)
ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS (mostly fragments) have been recovered through a building project in an Egyptian monastery:
It's not clear what other works might be contained in the fragments. The library itself is a treasure trove of Coptic, Arabic, Ethiopic, and Syriac manuscripts and the cataloguing and conserving of them has only just begun. Sounds like a likely place to find some Old Testament pseudepigrapha manuscripts. I hope so, anyway.
(Via Evangelical Textual Criticism.)
Ancient Manuscripts Found In Egyptian Monastery
Martin Bailey for The Art Newspaper (reprinted in Forbes)
A cache of manuscripts up to 1,500 years old has been discovered in a Coptic monastery in the Western Desert of Egypt. The find was made at Deir al-Surian, the Monastery of the Syrians, which already has one of the richest ancient libraries in Christendom. Set in the desert sands and virtually cut off from the outside world until recently, Deir al-Surian traces its roots back to the earliest period of Christian monasticism. Established in the 6th century, it was soon occupied by monks from Syria and Mesopotamia and is currently home to 200 Egyptian Copts.
[...]
A single completed manuscript and hundreds of fragments were found when reconstruction work was undertaken on the ancient tower, which is probably well over a millennium old. The library had originally been established there, since it was the most protected part of the monastery, but the first floor collapsed around five centuries ago, and a new wooden floor was simply inserted above. Recently the rubble of the earlier floor was removed during renovations, and curator Father Bigoul found a complete manuscript, embedded in a section of disused water pipe. (It is unclear if it was hidden there for safekeeping or got there by accident.) The parchment text has now been identified by Professor Lucas van Rompay of Duke University as a 9th-century Book of the Holy Hierothos.
A painstaking sifting of the rubble removed from the ancient tower also led to the discovery of around 600 fragments of early manuscripts. The earliest one identified, from around 500 A.D., is a single page from a hagiographical text, and this has now been linked with a manuscript in Russia. ...
It's not clear what other works might be contained in the fragments. The library itself is a treasure trove of Coptic, Arabic, Ethiopic, and Syriac manuscripts and the cataloguing and conserving of them has only just begun. Sounds like a likely place to find some Old Testament pseudepigrapha manuscripts. I hope so, anyway.
(Via Evangelical Textual Criticism.)
Sunday, February 26, 2006
MORE ON THE DA VINCI CODE LAWSUIT, a story I noted briefly last October. The London Times has the latest in an article from yesterday:
It would be interesting to hear Stephen Carlson's take on this one.
Interestingly, the print version of the article, which I have on my desk, adds a sentence that seems to have been deleted from the online version: "Cynics suggest that the claim has arisen from the book's huge success, which has also increased sales of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail." The cynical viewpoint has a certain logic to it. If they're sure the free publicity will increase the sales of their worthless book, the authors may not care whether they will or lose the case.
UPDATE (27 February): Stephen Carlson replies on his blog Hypotyposeis and in a comment on The Busybody blog. He confirms that this lawsuit arises from a peculiarity in British copyright law.
Incidentally (cross-file under "It's a Small World"), Stephen mentions a similar (and unsuccessful) American lawsuit over the 1975 movie The Hindenburg. It happens that I was in that movie; I played the cabin boy. (I'm afraid that, although I did have a few spoken lines, I didn't make it onto the cast list, so you'll just have to trust me on this one. Or rent the movie and look for the kid calling "Cablegram for Mr. Edward Douglas.")
The Times February 25, 2006Le me see if I have this straight. The author of a silly novel is being sued by the authors of a bogus "nonfiction" book because the author used their bogus ideas? It's true that rubbish writing is copyrighted, but rubbish ideas? I'm not a lawyer and I know even less about British copyright law that American, but I cannot see how this case can have any merit. Arrangements of words are copyrighted, but ideas (and one of Brown's characters even credits Baigent's and Leigh's book in the novel) are not. If you violate copyright when you cite someone else's work and use their ideas (but not their words) for your own work, then all scientists and scholars would be in trouble.
Author breaks code of silence
By Frances Gibb and Ben Hoyle
The reclusive writer of The Da Vinci Code is being forced to defend a copyright action that could scupper the release of a blockbuster film
THE fate of what is expected to be this year’s biggest film is hanging on the decision of a High Court judge.
The British release of The Da Vinci Code, due on May 19, could be delayed or even halted if a copyright claim by the authors of a non-fiction book, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, is upheld.
Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, who co-wrote the book 22 years ago, claim breach of copyright on the ground that the “architecture” or complex structure of their book — its essential theory — was plagiarised in Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code.
And next week the reclusive multimillionaire author will step out of the shadows into a courtroom. At stake is the vast fortune he has made from his worldwide cult hit and the millions more he will make from the eagerly awaited film.
Brown will be in London to defend his blend of conspiracy theory, sinister secret societies and thrilling adventure from the ground-breaking copyright claim whose significance could far outstrip its estimated £10 million worth.
He will be the key defence witness in an action brought against Random House, the parent publishers. The claim has the potential to set a precedent in copyright law, over the extent to which one author can draw on another’s ideas.
If the judge upholds the claim, Baigent and Leigh could seek an injunction preventing further infringement, affecting further sales of the book and delaying release of the film. Alternatively they could seek a share of profits.
[...]
It would be interesting to hear Stephen Carlson's take on this one.
Interestingly, the print version of the article, which I have on my desk, adds a sentence that seems to have been deleted from the online version: "Cynics suggest that the claim has arisen from the book's huge success, which has also increased sales of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail." The cynical viewpoint has a certain logic to it. If they're sure the free publicity will increase the sales of their worthless book, the authors may not care whether they will or lose the case.
UPDATE (27 February): Stephen Carlson replies on his blog Hypotyposeis and in a comment on The Busybody blog. He confirms that this lawsuit arises from a peculiarity in British copyright law.
Incidentally (cross-file under "It's a Small World"), Stephen mentions a similar (and unsuccessful) American lawsuit over the 1975 movie The Hindenburg. It happens that I was in that movie; I played the cabin boy. (I'm afraid that, although I did have a few spoken lines, I didn't make it onto the cast list, so you'll just have to trust me on this one. Or rent the movie and look for the kid calling "Cablegram for Mr. Edward Douglas.")
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)