Scientists and historians are raising fresh questions over the long-held belief that Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea. Recent archaeological findings and scholarly debates suggest that the historical birthplace of Jesus may not align with traditional narratives, with some experts proposing alternative locations such as Nazareth or another Bethlehem in Galilee.I don't seem to have posted on this question since 2007, but I agree with what I said there and don't have much to add. The current article does refer to more evidence that Bethlehem of Judea may have been inhabited in the first century CE. It's also interesting, but not significant, that the apocryphal Protevangelium of James places Jesus' birth not quite in Bethlehem, but in the desert between Bethlehem and Jerusalem.[...]
Jesus was born sometime around the turn of the era in Bethlehem of Judea, or another Bethlehem, or Nazarerth, or somewhere. We really don't know.
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.
