| PaleoJudaica.com A weblog on ancient Judaism and its context E-mail: paleojudaica-at-talktalk-dot-net ("-at-" = "@", "-dot-" = ".") |
|
Saturday, July 19, 2003 I'M OFF TO CAMBRIDGE early tomorrow morning for the International Society of Biblical Literature conference. As promised, I have posted my paper "(How) Can We Tell if a Greek Apocryphon or Pseudepigraphon Has Been Translated from Hebrew or Aramaic?" online, along with the handout that goes with it. It replaces an earlier version that was an online lecture for my Old Testament Pseudepigrapha course in 2002 and is a short and preliminary version of a chapter in the book that I intend to finish next year while on research leave. Comments welcome, as always. The conference starts tomorrow evening and goes until Friday morning. I will try to catch a few minutes here and there to let you know how things are going, but blogging is likely to be very light until Saturday the 26th. Meanwhile, I encourage you to visit the sites I mentioned when I left for the Enoch Seminar. (And by the way, Avraham, if Naomi Chana was there, she didn't reveal herself to me and I can't think of any likely candidates unless she's fiddled her biographical details.) Readers should also keep an eye on Bible and Interpretation News, which invariably has interesting online stuff pertaining to the Bible. Want more? Then have a look at The Sch�yen Collection: This is a huge private collection of manuscripts (ancient to modern) including Qumran and later Hebrew Bible manuscripts, NT and LXX manuscripts, Latin Bible fragments, Coptic Bible fragments, biblical and Christian Ethiopic MSS, Bible fragments in other languages, other Qumran texts and materials, and much more, ranging from Sumerian tablets to Shakespeare fragments, with good photographs of most of it. The collection is located mostly in London and Oslo and most of the manuscripts are not yet published, although publication of much of it is underway. I'm not sure our server problems are entirely over, so if you want to e-mail me about something it would be a good idea to wait until I'm back home. Have a good week, I'll blog if and when I can, and I expect to be back at my desk on Saturday, 26 July. posted by Jim Davila | 5:34 PM ANDREW SULLIVAN IS WONDERING ABOUT THE NAILS IN THE PALMS IN THE TRAILER FOR THE PASSION (scroll up for more). He cites two web pages, one of which is by a medical doctor and which includes some dodgy references (e.g., studies of the Shroud of Turin and stuff from Josh McDowell). The other is an article by Joseph Zias, who is perhaps the world's expert on the subject. In another article Zias said: The upright remained stationary and the victim carried the crossbeam to his execution. Once the crossbeam was affixed to the upright, the victim would be nailed or tied to the cross. In the case of nailing, the nail would be driven through the wrist rather than the palm. although he doesn't say why he concludes this. But elsewhere he is quoted as explaining: ``You cannot crucify a person through the hands because there is nothing there but skin and muscle. It will tear. It has to be through the wrist,'' So, sorry Mel Gibson, but physiology requires that crucifixion by nailing (as opposed to tying, which also happened � see both articles just quoted) was through the wrists, not the palms. UPDATE: Sullivan cites an unnamed reader who says that a "newer theory holds that indeed the hands and feet were entry points, but that wooden washers made from the cut trunk of young trees were used for additional support." I've never heard of this and no reference is cited. Would this prevent the palms from ripping? Is there any evidence for it? In any case, no wooden washers are visible in the trailer. Sullivan also notes that Pilate speaks Latin with the ecclesiastical pronunciation. UPDATE (21 July): Okay, the trailer does show ropes holding him to the cross. I doubt this would work (i.e., keep the hands from ripping through) but at least they're acknowledging the problem. And the Aramaic pronuciation sounds all right (Elohi rather than Matthews Eloi). posted by Jim Davila | 4:40 PM SOME PEOPLE COUNT THE REIGN OF CHARLEMAGNE AS THE END OF ANTIQUITY, so on that theory I'll link to the following story, which involves the king, a Jewish merchant, the Caliph Harun ar-Rashid, and a white elephant named Abu Abbas. Baghdad, Jerusalem, Aachen � On the Trail of the White Elephant (Deutsche Well) [�] posted by Jim Davila | 9:37 AM PROFESSOR SHMUEL SAFRAI has passed away. (Via H-Judaic Digest) We are saddened to learn of the passing, in Jerusalem, of Prof. Shmuel Safrai, Emeritus Professor of Jewish history at the Hebrew University, and one of the world's greatest experts on the era of the Second Temple. His numerous publications on the Temple, the Mishnah, the liturgy, the early synagogue, and more stand as a monument to his many decades of productive scholarship. Prof. Safrai passed away in his sleep in Jerusalem at age 84. May his memory be for a blessing. posted by Jim Davila | 9:34 AM THIS IS OFF TOPIC, but it's good news for archaeologists and, I think, for the American public as well. House Votes To Save Jobs Of Park Service Archaeologists posted by Jim Davila | 9:31 AM Friday, July 18, 2003 BAGHDAD MUSEUM LOOTING UPDATE: Roger Atwood's account of the looting of the Baghdad Museum has been reprinted by the Wall Street Journal (via Jack Sasson on the IraqCrisis list). Walter Sommerfeld's version of the same events (noted in the 23 June update here) has been reprinted by Counterpunch and Countercurrents and some similar sites. Which is more likely to be reliable? I blog, you decide. There's lot's more in the news about the looting of Iraqi antiquities but I don't have time to track it all. The current estimate is that about 10,500 artifacts were taken from the Baghdad Museum. And serious looting continues in many ruins. (I wish someone would take up my proposal to douse the looters with liquid putrescine from the air. Anyone know who I could suggest this to?). Anyhow, I encourage you either to subscribe to the IraqCrisis list and/or to watch its archive and Francis Deblauwe's site. posted by Jim Davila | 5:11 PM ACADEMIC TALMUD STUDY is listed as #4 in Jewsweek's list of not-quite-60 hottest people and things in the Jewish universe this year. Torah is #48, God is #52.5, and Alicia Silverstone is #1. But the list isn't ranked. posted by Jim Davila | 12:24 PM LOCAL NEWS: BRITISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL WEEKEND (via Archaeology Magazine News). The London Times reports: NEARLY 200 museums and archaeological sites across Britain will be open this weekend to celebrate National Archaeology Days. There's more information here. This ties in nicely with the Scotsman's report of two important Neolithic finds (via ditto) in the Kingdom of Fife, where St. Andrews is located. Let's party! posted by Jim Davila | 11:13 AM THE HARVARD GAZETTE INTERVIEWS KAREN KING ABOUT HER BOOK WHAT IS GNOSTICISM?: Student of early Christianities: As an experiment, I'm blogging from our local Internet cafe this morning. My coffee is finished and I think I've had enough for now, so I'm headed back to my office. posted by Jim Davila | 10:03 AM Thursday, July 17, 2003 SPEAKING OF BOB KRAFT, "'Parabiblical Literature' in Early Judaism and Early Christianity" is a course taught by Professor Kraft at the University of Pennsylvania last (2002-03) academic year in tandem with the Philadelphia Seminar on Christian Origins, which was devoted to the same topic. These course notes are just one of the pages on Bob's extraordinarily useful website. posted by Jim Davila | 4:38 PM THE JEWISH STUDIES QUARTERLY (Princeton University) is looking for a part-time managing editor (via Robert Kraft on the PSCO list). posted by Jim Davila | 4:26 PM BELIEFNET HAS AN INTERVIEW WITH ELAINE PAGELS about her new book Beyond Belief (via Bible and Interpretation News). posted by Jim Davila | 3:07 PM STEVE MASON ANNOUNCES A NT JOB OPENING AT YORK UNIVERSITY (via Ioudaios-L): Dear Colleagues:posted by Jim Davila | 1:35 PM HERE'S AN ARTICLE ON THE INTERNET SACRED TEXTS ARCHIVE, which I've been blogging on during the last week. Sacred Text Site Explains World Faiths (from Editor and Publisher) Read it all. The site has just added a section on Kwakiutl Tales. Cool. posted by Jim Davila | 11:51 AM PHILOLOGOS ON THE DECALOGUE: Decalogue or Eleven-alogue? (from Forward Magazine) To find out, read the rest of it. posted by Jim Davila | 10:11 AM Wednesday, July 16, 2003 HERE IS A MIDRASH BIBLIOGRAPHY compiled by faculty at HUC-JIR. Searchable and annotated with useful comments but does not seem to have been updated since 1997. posted by Jim Davila | 5:11 PM I'VE UPDATED YESTERDAY'S POST ON THE ZECHARIAH INSCRIPTION with a note from Joe Zias on those "earlier writings." posted by Jim Davila | 2:26 PM A NEW ARTICLE IN THE JERUSALEM PERSPECTIVE PIPELINE: A Quest for the Lost Hebrew Gospel I've recommended articles on this site in the past, so I should note that this is a very weak piece on the Semitic language background of the Gospels, which pretty much ignores the secondary literature (on the NT and on retroversion) over the last century. It also mixes up the question of reconstructing Q (composed in Greek) with the quite separate question of retroverting a Hebrew or Aramaic original from a Greek translation. Rather than trying to evaluate the piece at length (which I don't have time to do), I'll refer you to my paper on the latter problem for the Greek Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. I'm writing it now for presentation next week at the International Society of Biblical Literature meeting in Cambridge and, as usual, I'll post it before I go. Read it and you should be able to see why I'm so disappointed with this article, even as a popular presentation. Watch this space. posted by Jim Davila | 12:39 PM HERE'S A NEW ARTICLE IN BIBLE REVIEW: The True Cross As you probably already guessed, she didn't find the true cross. Indeed, it appears she didn't even find a fake one. An interesting story. The August issue also has an article by Bernhard Lang on the names of God, and some other goodies too. posted by Jim Davila | 10:49 AM NEW BOOK REVIEWS FROM THE REVIEW OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE: Silberman, Neil Asher and Ernest S. Frerichs Archaeology and Society in the 21st Century: The Dead Sea Scrolls and Other Case Studies Talmon, Shemaryahu, Jonathan Ben-Dov and Uwe Glessmer Qumran Cave 4 XVI: Calendrical Texts Funk, Wolf-Peter, Paul-Hubert Poirier and John D. Turner Marsanes (NH X) Turner, John D. Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition posted by Jim Davila | 9:30 AM Tuesday, July 15, 2003 DISCUSSION BETWEEN FRANK MOORE CROSS, ANDRE LEMAIRE AND HERSHEL SHANKS (via Bible and Interpretation News) Cross has thought for some time that the "James Ossuary" is a forgery. Shanks and Lemaire want to see the full IAA report before they are convinced. posted by Jim Davila | 5:11 PM JOE ZIAS E-MAILS regarding the Zechariah (Absalom's Tomb) Inscription: One last item, vis a vis the inscriptions atop Absalom. While the inscriptions are 4th century they are based on earlier writings which suggest that Zach. James and Simon may be buried there in the valley. We have just finished some more casting and preliminary results show that there are more inscriptions there. We will present these at the SBL meetings in Atlanta. What is of interest is that no one has challenged the finding, prob. because no dealers nor is Shanks involved, also Puech is one of those rare scholars who seldom 'gets it wrong. Secondly, as the insc. is 1.5 meters long one has to ask about literacy among the 'people of the book' it was def. meant to be seen from a distance. I'd like to hear more about these earlier writings. UPDATE (16 July): Joe Zias e-mails in reply: Basically I'm presently contemplating that that the (1st century AD?) "pillar" mentioned by Hegesippus in the 2nd (quoted by Eusebius)�may be identical to the "Absalom" monument. The quotation is from Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History 2.23. posted by Jim Davila | 2:24 PM IN RESPONSE TO MY MOST RECENT POSTING ON THE TEMPLE MOUNT, a reader e-mailed: I'm writing to you about the following from your blog: The reason why I found that comment "not very encouraging" is that it can hardly be taken by Muslims as anything but "fighting words." I don't know exactly what the speaker meant; maybe he was hoping that God would put a third temple on the Temple Mount in quantum superposition with the Dome of the Rock or put them both in parallel timelines linked to the temple platform or whatever, but what would naturally occur to most readers would be that he wanted the Dome of the Rock torn down and replaced with the third temple. Who knows how selectively he was quoted by the reporter who, being a reporter, would naturally display his words prominently and not necessarily in context. But saying anything like this to the media on a newly reopened tour of the Temple Mount was, to say the least, imprudent and unhelpful. To underline my point I refer you to a recent article in Al Jazeerah (via Protocols), which quoted "The Islamic Action Front (IAF), Jordan�s largest political party" as follows: �Bush spoke during the Aqaba meeting on June 4 about sharing the holy land between Israelis and the Palestinians. What Bush meant found expression in the Zionist decision allowing Jews to enter the Islamic shrine, because historians do not recognize the existence of any holy place for the Jews in Jerusalem,� the statement said. My italics. The Islamic Action Front is promoting a fantasy that denies a basic historical fact - the ancient Jewish temple on the Temple Mount, a fact verified by a vast amount of historical evidence - to support their political agenda. The article continues: The IAF cautioned that allowing Jews to visit Al-Aqsa Mosque had the aim of �demolishing the Islamic shrine and rebuilding the alleged biblical temple in its place�. My italics. Unfortunately, statements like the one from that Jewish tourist give support to this accusation and indirectly give credibility to the people who deny that there was a Jewish temple on the Temple Mount. When Jews and Christians call for a third temple on the Temple Mount, it can only be seen by Muslims as a provocation. It too is a fantasy, about the future rather than the past. Fantasizing about how we wish the past had been is futile: we can't change what really happened. Fantasizing about the future can be pretty futile too: what we imagine may not happen (and fantasies about what God is going to do have an especially poor track record). In the meantime there is the present to be lived in. I wish we could leave aside both fantasies and try to get along with each other right now. AFTERTHOUGHT: No, I'm not saying that all eschatological scenarios are false. How the heck could I know that? I'm saying that such scenarios have had a lousy track record so far and if you hold to one you should hold it with humility and put some real thought into how your expression of it affects events and people in the here-and-now. posted by Jim Davila | 11:10 AM Monday, July 14, 2003 HERE'S A COLLECTION OF JEWISH SCRIPTURES AND RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS from the Internet Sacred Text Archive. It includes links to the Hebrew Bible in Hebrew and in English, translations of the Talmud, Pirke Avot, Sepher Yetzirah, Kabbalah extracts, Midrash, and Maimonides. It also has Ginzberg's Legends of the Jews (already noted here) and some modern Jewish texts. The translations are generally very old and should not be used for serious work, but they could be useful for initial soundings and, of course, the price is right. posted by Jim Davila | 1:25 PM THERE IS A NEW E-MAIL DISCUSSION LIST ON ARAMAIC. (Via Jim West on Ioudaios-L.) posted by Jim Davila | 10:13 AM THE TRAILER FOR MEL GIBSON'S THE PASSION IS OUT. If you are squeamish don't watch it. Also, note to Mel: the nails go in the wrists, not the palms. Even Stigmata got that right. posted by Jim Davila | 9:25 AM Sunday, July 13, 2003 NOW THIS TECHNOLOGY MAY HAVE PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS IN OUR FIELD SOMEDAY: Maybe time travel could be possible (USA Today) This is an old article (06/20/2001) but Professor Mallett was recently featured on the Discovery Channel and he also gave a public lecture on his work last week. Unfortunately, the device they're building only transfers atomic particles through time, but I suppose that's a start. A greater drawback is that travel to the past can't go any farther back than when the time machine itself was built, so we'd have to borrow a machine from a friendly ancient alien civilization if we wanted to go back to paleojudaic times. Other articles on Professor Mallett's work can be found in the Village Voice and Ananova. posted by Jim Davila | 9:06 PM THE EARLY JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN MYSTICISM WEB PAGE of the Society of Biblical Literature lists the papers that have been presented in the group since its inception in 1996. The texts of many of the papers are included. I'm currently a member of its steering committee. posted by Jim Davila | 8:47 AM ARCHAEOLOGY IS RUBBISH. A new book by the people who make the television series "Time Team" in Britain. posted by Jim Davila | 8:31 AM MORE ON THE ARAMAIC MUSIC OF SAEVE: Music taps roots of religion (Cincinnati Enquirer) The San Antonio Vocal Arts Ensemble are playing in the Cathedral of St. Peter in Chains in downtown Cincinnati today. For a sample of their music go here. posted by Jim Davila | 8:24 AM HERE'S A ROUNDUP OF THE CURRENT SITUATION WITH THE "JAMES OSSUARY": Defender of 1st-century Jesus inscription fight back following Israeli fraud charge (Dodge City Daily Globe) Nothing new, but it covers what's been said and done so far. posted by Jim Davila | 8:16 AM |
|
|||