As the Hermetic texts were presented, they contained huge problems. As we now know, these scriptures were written far later than they initially appeared, and they actually dated from Egypt in the second and third centuries AD. If they resembled Neoplatonism, for example, that was because they were influenced by that movement, rather than the other way round. In retrospect, we see that Hermes Trismegistus himself was a classic product of the religion of Ptolemaic or Roman Egypt, a hybrid that united the Greek Hermes with the Egyptian god Thoth.I think that Ficino, Pico, Bruno, and their colleagues made a strategic error in focusing on an erroneous early date as the source of authority for the Hermetica. When Casaubon debunked the date, everyone dropped the corpus. But its NeoPlatonic-Egyptian-Gnostic philosophy and theology are of some interest in themselves. It took a long time for people to notice that again. See David Litwa's Hermetica I for a recent treatment from this perspective.
This Anxious Bench post is a continuation of Professor Jenkins's Lost and Found Scriptures series. For earlier posts, see here and links.
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.