In May 2006, Tim Stinson travelled to England to tour the libraries of London, Oxford and Cambridge. ...All of the examples in the article involve analysis of medieval manuscripts, the earliest from the eighth century. But applying the process to more ancient manuscripts sounds possible, assuming researchers can find a non-destructive way to harvest the samples.Nearly two decades later, that curiosity has helped to give rise to a new field. The development of non-destructive sampling methods, alongside advances in genomics and proteomics, have made it possible to extract biological information from ancient parchments without visibly damaging them. The emerging discipline — known as biocodicology — combines molecular biology with codicology, the study of books as material objects.
The results are transforming how scholars understand human history. By analysing parchment, researchers are uncovering evidence of trade networks, animal husbandry, medical and ritual practices, climate change, epidemics and floods.
In the process, they have found that ancient parchments preserve more than just words.
I noted a recent unrelated project (at pre-print publication stage) which applied such methods to the Shroud of Turin here. I see that Scientific American has also published a response to it:
DNA analysis claiming new origins for the Shroud of Turin doesn't hold up, experts say. A metagenomic study of this cloth, controversially purported to bear the imprint of the body of Jesus Christ, has little to say about the relic’s origins (BY STEPHANIE PAPPAS EDITED BY JEANNA BRYNER).
Cross-file under Paleogenetics.
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.