| PaleoJudaica.com A weblog on ancient Judaism and its context E-mail: paleojudaica-at-talktalk-dot-net ("-at-" = "@", "-dot-" = ".") |
|
Saturday, May 27, 2006 STILL MARKING EXAMS. Almost there. Meanwhile, here are a couple more Da Vinci Code reviews: Lesa Bellevie on the Magdelene Review blog: "Da Vinci, slowed..."She says to wait for the DVD. If you want to bother to see it at all, that's probably good advice. A funny one by Anthony Lane, posted on Dr. Cathey's blog: "Heaven Can Wait"posted by Jim Davila | 6:08 PM Friday, May 26, 2006 ANOTHER ACADEMIC BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL is being proposed in Britain. The lecturers' union known as NATFHE (National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education) is considering a motion to boycott Israeli academic institutions and individual academics in its annual conference, which starts tomorrow. Here's the full text of the motion from the NATFHE website: 198C ACADEMIC RESPONSIBILITYFurther background here and here. I don't have a lot of time to comment on this, so I'll just say that it's amazing to find this happening only a year after the similar AUT motion was passed and then, in an embarrassing climbdown, unpassed. The international reputation of the AUT suffered greatly and won't recover for a long time to come. The only conclusion I can come to is that lecturers' unions in the U.K. are led by people with hard-leftist, anti-Israel agendas that are more important to them than any prospect of doing any good for actual British lecturers. Especially at this very sensitive time of the controversial AUT [update: NATFHE too] work slowdown, this is hardly the sort of international publicity that the academic unions need. If any NATFHE members who are going to the conference are reading this, I strongly urge you to vote against this motion. Besides the fact that passing it would be grossly unfair and disproportionate (see my AUT-motion post above), it also would only create an international blowback that would seriously damage NATFHE's reputation and futher damage the AUT. NATFHE would be faced either with having to try to undo the damage later on by revoking the motion, as the AUT did, or else it would be faced with mass defections. Don't go there. UPDATE (27 May): Scholars for Peace in the Middle East has an online petition opposing the NATFHE motion. At the moment they have about 4700 signatures. UPDATE (29 May): They passed it. Obviously this is not about looking after the interests of British academics. It's about about scoring imagined political points on another subject even at their expense. UPDATE (1 June): More here. A proposed boycott boycott and some comments on the shady timing of the boycott motion. UPDATE: (11 June): As I predicted, the motion has been revoked, but only after adding much further damage to the reputation of the union. posted by Jim Davila | 3:11 PM NEWS ON THE ONLINE CRITICAL PSEUDEPIGRAPHA PROJECT: 1. New, permanent URL for the Project website: http://www.purl.org/net/ocp.(Via Torrey Seland's Philo of Alexandria blog.) posted by Jim Davila | 10:44 AM A NEW BOOK ON RASHI is reviewed in Haaretz 'I will sing for Rashi'posted by Jim Davila | 9:27 AM MORE ON THE ISRAEL MUSEUM RENOVATION from the Art Newspaper: Israel Museum gets biggest overhaul in its 40-year historyThe article has a nice photo of the new entry pavilion. posted by Jim Davila | 9:17 AM Thursday, May 25, 2006 THAT MODEL OF SECOND TEMPLE JERUSALEM has been moved to the Israel Museum and opens to the public on 12 June. Second Temple Model moves to Israel Museumposted by Jim Davila | 9:26 AM Wednesday, May 24, 2006 SOME EGYPTIAN BLOGGERS in detention have been released, but Alaa is not among them. The Sandmonkey has details. At least there's some progress. posted by Jim Davila | 2:20 PM IN THE MAIL: James D. Tabor, The Jesus Dynasty: The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of ChristianityKindly sent to me by the author. UPDATE: Follow the link above and scroll down for Tabor's review of the The Da Vinci Code movie. He also notes its tendency to correct errors in the book and he gives another good example that I'd forgotten. He liked it better as a movie than I did. posted by Jim Davila | 11:42 AM THE INK AND BLOOD EXHIBITION is moving to Daytona Beach, Florida, where they hope to pick up some business from the Da Vinci Code movie. Ancient mysteries of 'Ink & Blood'If you're thinking of going, remember that their Dead Sea Scrolls look like burnt cornflakes and that the Marzeah Papyrus may be a forgery. posted by Jim Davila | 9:20 AM Tuesday, May 23, 2006 CARNIVALESQUE XV has been published by Brandon Watson on Siris. It is an Ancient/Medieval edition and a good number of bibliobloggers are cited. posted by Jim Davila | 9:33 PM A JOINT CONFERENCE ON HEBREW AND ARAMAIC by "the five Hebrew Language Departments in Israel (Haifa, Tel Aviv, Bar Ilan, Ben-Gurion and the Hebrew University) and the Academy for the Hebrew Language is about to take place on June 12th." Shai Heijmans gives the program at the Hebrew and Aramaic Philology blog. posted by Jim Davila | 5:28 PM FORGOTTEN FRAGMENTS FROM THE CAIRO GENIZA have been rediscovered in Geneva. Manuscript Boy has the story over at Hagahot. posted by Jim Davila | 2:52 PM DA VINCI CODE REVIEW (THE MOVIE): I saw The Da Vinci Code last night. My expectations were low, but it was better than I'd anticipated. I didn't think it dragged and it was pretty entertaining throughout. The acting of Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou was wooden, although Ian McKellan's hamming it up helped to keep the pace moving. Most people will see the film already knowing who the Teacher is, so that element of surprise is lost. My comments below contain a few minor spoilers, so if you haven't seen the movie and you care, stop here. I have reviewed the book here. I thought it was interesting that the movie not only corrected some errors by omission (e.g., that the Dead Sea Scrolls were Christian documents), it also seemed to go out of its way to correct a few (by no means all!!) of the historical errors in the book. Langdon challenges Teabing's reference to the Priory of Sion and says that it's been discredited. (Teabing, of course, says ha ha that's what they want you to think.) And when Teabing spouts the nonsense about the idea of a divine Jesus only arising in Constantine's time, Langdon vigorously and correctly asserts that it had been around for a long time before that, and Teabing does not disagree [but see update, 3 June, below]. All in all, that awful bogus infodump in the middle of the book is made more bearable in the movie, mainly because it's shorter. Also, the movie is very careful to make clear that neither the Vatican nor Opus Dei are part of the evil plot. The baddies are part of a secret faction within Opus Dei (I believe Langdon once refers to them as "fascist Opus Dei," although I'm not sure I heard this clearly.) Indeed, Captain Bezu Fache is made a member of the real Opus Dei and he pursues and captures the Teacher in righteous wrath once he figures out what's really going on. So it's an okay movie that tries to undo a little of the damage of the book, although it probably does that much damage and more by spreading the rest of Brown's nonsense even more widely so that more gullible people will believe it. But the up side is that millions of people are now enthusiastically debating historical and theological issues that they were not even aware of a few years ago. It reminds of what the fourth-century visitor to Constantinople wrote: 'This city,' says he, 'is full of mechanics and slaves, who are all of them profound theologians, and preach in the shops and in the streets. If you desire a man to change a piece of silver, he informs you wherein the Son differs from the Father; if you ask the price of a loaf, you are told, by way of reply, that the Son is inferior to the Father; and if you inquire whether the bath is ready, the answer is, that the Son was made out of nothing.'" (Gibbon)Those of us who specialize in areas Dan Brown has made popular should find opportunities for some teachable moments and we should take advantage of them. Meanwhile, if I want to watch a historical-nonsense thriller again, I'll be getting out Raiders of the Lost Ark or The Mummy, not this one. UPDATE (1 June): Over the weekend AKMA e-mailed: Wasn't the "visitor to Constantinople" to whom Gibbon adverted Gregory of Nyssa? My notes suggest that the quoted passage comes from "On the Deity of the Son and of the Spirit."Could be. Anyone have the reference? UPDATE: Robert S. Schwartz e-mails that Gibbon's footnote (which is not at the site I linked to, but can be found here) indicates that he himself did not have the reference: Footnote 25: See Jortin's Remarks on Ecclesiastical History, vol. iv. p. 71. The thirty-third Oration of Gregory Nazianzen affords indeed some similar ideas, even some still more ridiculous; but I have not yet found the words of this remarkable passage, which I allege on the faith of a correct and liberal scholar.Oh well, it's a good story. Does anyone have Gregory's quote handy? UPDATE (3 June): Teabing does not dispute Langdon's correction that the idea of Jesus' divinity had been around for a long time, but he does reply with this howler: "Facts, for many Christians: Jesus was mortal one day and divine the next." Nonsense. The idea of Jesus as a divine being goes back to the first-generation Jesus movement and it's possible it even goes back to Jesus himself. Such ideas about people like Enoch and Melchizedek were circulating in the Judaism of Jesus' time. People in the time of Constantine who considered themselves to be "Christians" all believed in the divinity of Jesus, although they disagreed widely and violently about what exactly this meant. (I follow the transcript of Langdon and Teabing's conversation posted on Mark D. Roberts's blog. Scroll to the bottom of the page.) posted by Jim Davila | 10:18 AM Monday, May 22, 2006 BILL GATES has expressed in interest in learning the methods of Gemara (the Talmudic commentary on the Mishnah) and investing in a relevant Yeshiva computer program, according to Arutz Sheva. posted by Jim Davila | 1:21 PM "GNOSTIC GOSPELS one key to Da Vinci Code origins." The Houston Chronicle interviews April DeConick and Harold Attridge about the Gnostic Gospels. posted by Jim Davila | 1:09 PM DA VINCI CODE KNOCK-ON EFFECT: 'Da Vinci Code' breathes new life into old theoriesThere's a certain Orwellian element to the language in this story. Silly, unfounded notions about history are "theories." Gullible is "open minded." These "theories" are worth covering because academics "say the ideas are fanciful -- but impossible to disprove." (Someone make this reporter write an essay on the concept of "burden of proof.") They are also "convincing to many" (of the gullible people mentioned above.) I'm a little under the weather today and am at home, marking final exams (or trying to). So I'm probably grumpier than usual. But the tone of the article is irritating. It's reasonable to cover such things, but it isn't reasonable to try to set up an equivalence between academics who reject the ideas and some other "open-minded" "many" who find them "convincing" because they are "impossible to disprove." Sigh. posted by Jim Davila | 1:02 PM Sunday, May 21, 2006 THE LOST GOSPEL: The Quest for the Gospel of Judas Iscariot, by Herbert Krosney, is reviewed by William Murchison in the Washington Times. Excerpt: Then to the point. Says Jesus to Judas: "[Y]ou will exceed all of [the disciples]. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me." Mr. Krosney explains: "Jesus is asking Judas to hand him over and sacrifice him. The reasons become clearer. Jesus' life on Earth is only in the guise of a man. The man provides clothes for the spirit within. Jesus is an eternal figure; he is part of the higher God . . ."I trust the book makes clear that the "early era" is the second century and not the first. posted by Jim Davila | 8:35 AM THE CRADLE OF CHRISTIANITY EXHIBITION in Cleveland gets a good review from Tom L. Freudenheim in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles: Show Decodes Early Years of 2 Religionsposted by Jim Davila | 8:25 AM |
|
|||