While I think that Ophir and Rosen-Zvi make as convincing a case as any modern Pauline scholar for how Paul might be read, I think that their reading is subject to the same problems that have long bedeviled modern (or, for that matter, ancient) readers who have tried to read Paul’s letters as though they were engaged in a systematic project. Like the biblical and Pauline conception of the “remnant” (164), there is always a remainder that escapes systematization. ...Another installment in the AJR forum on Ophir and Rosen-Zvi, Goy, on which more here and links.
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.
