The rabbis claim that a “subverted” or “apostate” city, which Deuteronomy (13:13-18) condemns to destruction, “never was and never will be” (t. San. 14:1). Yet the account in Judges 19-21 of the destruction or ḥerem of Gibeah, its inhabitants, animals, and property, suggests that such “internal ḥerem” was an Israelite practice, and that Gibeah is being presented as a subverted city.Or, more precisely, the story suggests that the Deuteronomistic Historian thought that it had once been an Israelite practice.
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.
