| PaleoJudaica.com A weblog on ancient Judaism and its context E-mail: paleojudaica-at-talktalk-dot-net ("-at-" = "@", "-dot-" = ".") |
|
Saturday, June 30, 2007 IN THE MAIL: Gabriele Boccaccini (ed.), Enoch and the Messiah Son of Man: Revisiting the Book of Parables (Eerdmans, 2007)posted by Jim Davila | 12:03 PM Thursday, June 28, 2007 THE SAN DIEGO DEAD SEA SCROLLS EXHIBIT OPENS TOMORROW. Here is yet another advance review: Dead Sea Scrolls: Long-awaited exhibit offers sights, sounds, smells and samplesAnd here's some information I don't think I've highlighed yet: Also on display are 11 pages from several 1,000-year-old Hebrew Bibles on loan from the Russian government as well as 17th and 18th century Ethiopic copies of the Bible and three pages from a six-year contemporary project, the Saint John's Bible, which seeks to replicate the medieval tradition of illuminating manuscripts, among many other such treasures.posted by Jim Davila | 9:17 AM GOSPEL OF JUDAS WATCH: Another review of Reading Judas by King and Pagels has come out, this one by Stephen Prothero in the New York Times. Excerpt: Although Pagels and King attend with care to the ironies of a text that both attacks Christian martyrdom and sets Judas up as the first Christian martyr, they are less effective in dealing with the most disturbing feature of this gospel: Jesus’ sarcastic laughter. In the Gospel of Judas, Jesus laughs no fewer than four times. He laughs not with his disciples but at them — for worshiping incorrectly and for misunderstanding his teachings. “Teacher, why are you laughing at us?” Judas asks. Good question. Pagels and King devote scant attention to it, responding simply that this laughter is intended to spur Jesus’ disciples on to “higher spiritual vision.” To me, however, it just sounds mean-spirited, turning Jesus into the sort of person you wouldn’t like, much less worship.posted by Jim Davila | 9:13 AM Wednesday, June 27, 2007 THE RENEWAL OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM is now getting underway: Israel Museum starts $80 million renewal projectIt's a "renewal" but not a "renovation." I'm not sure why. But it looks as though the price tag has gone up by $30 million since March of 2006. In any case, it sounds impressive. posted by Jim Davila | 10:01 AM GOSPEL OF JUDAS WATCH: Reading Judas, by Karen King and Elaine Pagels, is reviewed in the New York Sun by Bruce Chilton. Excerpt: Reading Judas" is beautifully presented as well as generally well written, and it sets discussion of Judas along a productive direction. But its failure to bring "Judas" into dialogue with its counterparts in the Christian Bible and patristic writings makes the treatment less engaged with the passionate diversity of the period than it should have been.posted by Jim Davila | 9:54 AM Tuesday, June 26, 2007 MY MASADA SKELETONS POST from a couple of days ago has been updated. posted by Jim Davila | 10:18 PM NOMINATIONS ARE REQUESTED for Biblical Studies Carnival 19. Stephen Cook e-mails: Dear Colleagues, Good morning, and please excuse this mass email. I am hosting this month's Carnival at my blog at www.biblische.blogspot.com Could you please post a reminder to folks to send in their favorite posts from this month to me? Would each of you also be willing to email me either your own nomination or what you consider to be the best post from your own blog for the month of June? Thanks so much for your help! I hope the summer is going great for each of you. My email address is SCook@vts.edu Peace,posted by Jim Davila | 9:55 PM PETER SCHÄFER'S BOOK, JESUS IN THE TALMUD, is reviewed in the Jerusalem Post, by Gershom Gale, editor of The Jerusalem Post Christian edition. He doesn't like it. Excerpt: In short, it seems he searched several digital editions of the Talmud for possible references to Jesus, and with the understandably meager results of such investigation (after all, Jews are strongly discouraged from naming or discussing a person convicted of a capital crime), constructed his central thesis - that the Talmud's few and enigmatic references to him represent "a highly ambitious and devastating counter-narrative," "a well-designed attack" by Babylonian rabbis who intended to mock the Gospels' accounts of Jesus's birth, life, death and resurrection, while defending his condemnation as a sorcerer who led Israel astray.For more on Jesus in the Talmud see here and follow the links. UPDATE (27 June): The review is taken apart by Simon Holloway in his Davar Akher blog. (Via the Iyov blog.) posted by Jim Davila | 11:12 AM THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS EXHIBITION IN SAN DIEGO, which opens on Friday, is covered once again, this time in the LA Times. It notes that Norman Golb and Robert Eisenman are unhappy with the coverage of their theories about the origins of the Scrolls. A lively debate over the Dead Sea ScrollsFor more on Norman Golb, see here. Robert Eisenman's work is more controversial than Golb's and I don't know of any specialists in the Dead Sea Scrolls who find convincing his attempts to connect the Scrolls with early Christianity. I can't find a useful recent discussion of his theories (here's a Time article from 1992), but this is his most recent book. posted by Jim Davila | 10:57 AM BREVARD CHILDS is dead at the age of 83. The Yale Divinity School has an obituary: Brevard S. Childs, an iconic figure in biblical scholarship, dies at 83As noted in the obituary, St. Andrews Divinity postgraduate Daniel Driver has a Brevard S. Childs website with lots of additional information. Daniel also has a blog, Occasional Publications, whose most recent post is a tribute to Childs. Requiescat in pace. posted by Jim Davila | 9:36 AM Monday, June 25, 2007 JEWISH MAGIC makes an appearance in a conference on health in the Middle Ages at the University of Nottingham: Demonic Possession And Miraculous HealingThe lecture in question is: '”This should not be shown to a gentile”: Medico-magical entries in medieval Franco-German Hebrew manuscripts and their social significance', Ephraim Shoham-Steiner, Ben-Gurion University, Israel. Includes a discussion of texts detailing short potions, charms and medical remedies in the pages of Hebrew manuscripts.posted by Jim Davila | 5:18 PM Sunday, June 24, 2007 SOME FAMOUS SKELETONS FROM MASADA are being given a new interpretation: Researchers claim to have solved mystery of Masada remains (The Scotsman)Actually the occupiers of Masada were Sicarii, not Zealots. The core argument is given as follows: The new paper focuses on the hair, noting the absence of a skeleton to go with it. Forensic analysis showed the hair had been cut off the woman's head with a sharp instrument while she was still alive.Typically, the article does not give the biblical reference. The passage in question seems to be Deuterononmy 21:10-14: 10: "When you go forth to war against your enemies, and the LORD your God gives them into your hands, and you take them captive,If this passage applies to the Masada scenario, it would imply that one of the Sicarii occupiers had taken the captured gentile woman as a wife. It doesn't seem likely to me that an eligible woman would have been found in a remote Roman garrison, but I suppose it isn't entirely impossible. One question is whether she had to be an unmarried virgin. The passage seems to imply this, since she only bewails her mother and father, not her (dead?) husband or her children. Still, the earlier passage in Deuteronomy 20:10-15 which deals with holy war commands the preservation of all women as "booty," which may imply that any captured woman could be taken as a wife or concubine: 10: "When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it.I would not have expected that whole families would be living in the garrison at Masada with women potentially eligible if captured, but I don't know much about the social organization of Roman garrisons in the provinces. Incidentally, I read the hair and nail cutting in Deuteronomy 21 to be a rite of passage to mark the woman's changed status, not any effort to make her less attractive. Anyhow, an interesting theory to go with an odd piece of evidence from Masada. I'll try to get a chance to look up the article, which doubtless presents the arguments much more clearly and in greater detail. UPDATE: It's actually an AP article and the Washington Post has a more complete version. Note in particular the following: Ehud Netzer, a veteran Hebrew University archaeologist who participated in the 1960s dig and later oversaw restoration work there, questioned the new findings.UPDATE (26 June): Joe Zias kindly sent me a copy of the article and it does clarify one of my questions above, about women at provincial Roman garrisons in this period: As to the inevitable question of a woman garrisoned atop Masada prior to its capture by the Zealots, a cache of documents found preserved in a Roman period fort in northern Britain reveal that higher-level Roman officers and soldiers often brought women with them during military campaigns (Bowman 1994: 51–65). Therefore the shorn woman may have been married or at least related to one of the two males killed and thrown into the Northern Palace bathhouse. Her braided hair however suggests that she was married, since a woman in the Greco-Roman world changed her hairstyle after marriage to symbolize her unavailability to any man but her husband (Cosgrove 2005).Bowman 1994 is the following: Bowman, A. K.The slightly later garrison at Vindolanda did, of course, include whole families. UPDATE (27 June): Josh Waxman comments at Parshablog. posted by Jim Davila | 10:21 AM |
|
|||