ISRAEL AS CARTHAGE? The analogy is kind of jarring, but perhaps that was intended. At least this time Rome isn't America. Elyakim Haetzni makes the comparison in two essays, one in Arutz Sheva and the other in Ynet. Excerpt from the latter:

Carthage was ruled by a "peace party" of elites - corrupt, incompetent and sold on the Romans. In opposition stood the "war party," who claimed that compromise bought only time, and that Rome's goal was to destroy, not co-exist, with Carthage.

[Theodor] Mommsen's description [in "The History of Rome"] could well be talking about modern-day Israel: "In a country clearly threatened with a war of destruction, the geniuses, the determined and the committed will plan immediately to attack, but they will be swallowed up by the lazy, cowardly money-worshippers, who will push off the final battle at any cost, in order to live, and to obtain their deaths, in peace."

Army chief Hamilcar Barca and his son Hannibal planned the defensive war against Rome far away from home, with funding they had to raise themselves - from provinces they'd captured in Spain.

Hannibal crossed the Alps, attacked the Romans on their own territory and reached the gates of Rome. His fall was in part due to the fact that he was not supported financially from home, and reinforcements arrived sporadically.

Make of it what you will. David Meadows (who is back from Sicily and blogging like a fiend) notes this piece as well.

UPDATE (27 August): Joshua Tallent comments here.