The Book of Enoch has long stirred debates among theologians, historians, and believers. Dismissed in most Western traditions as apocryphal and excluded from the canonical Bible, it has often been labelled a “false” book. Yet, when approached with reason, the very tool Aquinas urged Christians to employ in theological debate, one may arrive at a different conclusion. Instead of dismissing the book outright, it is worth re-examining its origins, significance, and theological contributions.This essay is just one example of a current trend to reasses the theological and metaphysical (etc.!) relevance of 1 Enoch and related ancient works. As I've noted, some of this is fringe. But there is popular mainstream interest to, as illustrated by this article in a lay Catholic publication.
.
Applying the framework of asking the “5WH” questions: who, what, when, where, why, and how – we can reason through why the Book of Enoch should not be entirely discredited. However, this ancient book should be read with discernment and wisdom, not accepted with naive gullibility.
Likewise, this article in another well-established lay Catholic publication shows some cautiously sympathetic interest in 1 Enoch: 10 Fascinating Facts About the Mysterious Enoch. A closer look at the enigmatic Old Testament figure whose fidelity and fate have intrigued believers for centuries (Bradley Shumaker, National Catholic Register).
7. The Book of Enoch Is an Ancient Jewish Text, Not Included in the Biblical CanonAs the next point notes, "8. The New Testament Letter of Jude Quotes the Book of Enoch." The direct quotation of 1 Enoch 1:9 in Jude 14-15, labeled as Enoch prophesying, makes it awkward for Christians to dismiss the book entirely.
The Book of Enoch, which is also known as 1 Enoch (as there are two later books), is an ancient Jewish apocalyptic text. It is considered by the Church as apocryphal, in other words, not considered divinely inspired and therefore not included as part of the Bible’s canon of Scripture. Scholars estimate that it was written in the third century B.C., or perhaps even earlier, but do not regard Enoch as the author. Fragments of it in the Aramaic language (which is thought to be its original language) were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were discovered in 1947. For centuries, it was lost in Europe, but in 1773, a Scotsman named James Bruce brought the book back from Ethiopia, which led to increased attention on its content.
I take no position on any such theological issues. But these articles are further illustrations of the current, I think increasing, interest in 1 Enoch, the story of the watchers, and noncanonical scriptures more generally. I noted another recent example here.
Visit PaleoJudaica daily for the latest news on ancient Judaism and the biblical world.
