| PaleoJudaica.com A weblog on ancient Judaism and its context E-mail: paleojudaica-at-talktalk-dot-net ("-at-" = "@", "-dot-" = ".") |
|
Saturday, June 10, 2006 MORE INFORMATION on the upcoming Dead Sea Scrolls exhibition in Kansas city: Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit here could sell out, sponsors sayI hope this helps with the museum's financial straits. Other similar exhibits have certainly been very successful. The article includes a detailed lists of scrolls to be exhibited: Scrolls in the exhibitThere is also lecture series with a stellar cast of scholars. posted by Jim Davila | 8:32 AM THE BOOK OF LOST BOOKS, by Stuart Kelly, is excerpted and profiled by NPR ("Recovering Literature's 'Lost Books'"). The audio file should be available later today. This is a topic near and dear to my own heart and I'll have to have a look at this book. posted by Jim Davila | 8:17 AM Friday, June 09, 2006 SOME GREEK FRAGMENTS OF EXODUS from the same find that brought us the Gospel of Judas have been published in Vetus Testamentum. This according to Wieland Willker on the Textual Criticism list. He writes: As you probably know, the Gospel of Judas book find did not consist of the Gospel of Judas alone, but also of other books, including Exodus in Greek and Colossians in Coptic.The article is available online here (but requires a paid personal or institutional subscription to access). Weiland has links to info on other fragments as well, so read his whole message. posted by Jim Davila | 2:29 PM iBOOK UPDATE: I've not received any e-mail notification, but the repair-status webpage now indicates that the repair is complete and reads "Product return pending (09-Jun-2006)." I suppose that's a good sign. posted by Jim Davila | 2:11 PM NEIL ALTMAN, the self-appointed and bogus Dead Sea Scrolls scholar, is at it again. He has some articles in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette which promote his notion that the Scrolls are medieval, have Chinese symbols in them, etc. The links are subscription-only, and I somehow managed to access one, briefly, but couldn't get it back. Thus I haven't commented on the pieces. But now the Union, Trueheart, and Courtesy blog, run by Donna Bowman, has a post on the pieces with alternate, accesible links to two of them, along with relevant other links and trenchant commentary. Excerpt: Well, thanks to our newspaper's decision to give him an unopposed forum for his Da Vinci Code-esque theories, a bunch of Arkansans who don't know squat about the Dead Sea Scrolls are going to think they come from 1200 and provide no information at all about first century Judaism, Gnosticism, and Christian sectarianism. Anybody who tells them otherwise is going to be dismissed as a puppet of the anti-Christian academic conspiracy. Sigh.Unfortunately, other newspapers in the United States, Britain, and Canada have served their readers equally ill by publishing Altman's nonsense. Their continued irresponsibility and gullibility is breathtaking. On the question of red ink in the Isaiah Scroll, last week James Trever, son of the late John C. Tever who took the photos, e-mailed me the following: Something you might want to note regarding some of Neil's theories is that he points out red dots a various places on the photos in the 1972 "Scrolls from Qumran Cave I". I have the proofs Dad marked up for the printing of the 1972 color volume and he points all those out as something that should be removed, as they do not exist on the original transparencies. So they show up, somehow, from the process that the publisher used to print the color images. Dad was not successful in completely eliminating them, as the editor probably did not think it consequential. Unfortunately, controversy makes money and that is all these guys like Altman are doing.Altman and his sometime collaborator David Crowder were informed of this, but they seem not to have accepted it. I have commented at length on articles on the Scrolls by Altman and Crowder here, here, here, and here. And on a different topic here. Note especially that they cannot be trusted to report accurately the opinions of scholars they interview. UPDATE: Perhaps it's worth reflecting a little on why it is that Altman's scholarship is bogus. We're told he has "done graduate work" at various places and that he has a Master's degree in Old Testament, but not that he has any training in the Dead Sea Scrolls. (Or, one might note, in Chinese!) A Master's degree will orient someone to some of the basic primary and secondary literature in a field and introduce them to some basic methodology, but does not prepare them to do original research in that field, nor is it meant to. (A minority do end up doing original work in a Master's thesis, but this is the exception.) The difference between Master's level work and the Ph.D. is that the Ph.D. is specifically designed to teach someone to do original research in a field and actually guides them through the production of a substantial project that makes an independent contribution to the field. They are guided by one or more specialists in the field who themselves publish original research in peer-review journals, monographs, and specialist conferences. Having a Master's degree does not qualify one as a specialist in any field, let alone one different from the topic of the degree. Altman is not professionally qualified to do original research in the Dead Sea Scrolls, yet he not only thinks that he can make original contributions to the field, he thinks that all actual specialists in it are wrong in their central understanding of the data and that he can completely overturn the major conclusions of that field. This is the sort of gall displayed by someone who really doesn't understand what he is taking on. Moreover, look closely at how he is making this supposed contribution. It is not by publishing articles in specialist journals or monographs in specialist series or presenting papers at specialist conferences. Instead he goes to the popular media and presents them with his notions (they don't deserve to be called theories) as though they were real research on the Scrolls. He also validates these notions by misconstruing conversations he had with actual specialists. These concepts are not particularly difficult, but present evidence seems to indicate that they are beyond a number of newspaper editors. What is so hard about identifying a real specialist or two and vetting Altmanesque ideas with them? What is so difficult about contacting the specialists Altman quotes and asking them if he is reporting their views correctly? There was a day when I assumed that this was how newspapers operated. Long before I started this blog I had learned better, but maintaining PaleoJudaica for the last three years has really opened my eyes to how slapdash and irresponsible the media often are in my areas of expertise. And it is only reasonable to extrapolate that they are just as often equally careless and ill-informed when they report on things I don't know about. Altman is culpable for presenting himself as an expert when he is not, but these newspapers are doubly culpable for being unable to identify a real expert, mainly because they can't be bothered to undertake the most basic verification. posted by Jim Davila | 11:57 AM ANOTHER OBITUARY FOR LOU H. SILBERMAN, this one on the Vanderbilt University website: Jewish studies scholar Lou H. Silberman dead at 91; Played role in James Lawson saga at Vanderbilt 6-7-2006posted by Jim Davila | 10:19 AM BABATHA is Neri Livneh's heroine: My heroine, at lastThat's certainly a new perspective. But not an unfitting one. UPDATE(11 June): Reader Stuart Bornstein has e-mailed to point out that the "Maccabean revolt" in the article should be the Bar Kokhba revolt. Thanks, I should have caught that. posted by Jim Davila | 10:11 AM Thursday, June 08, 2006 iBOOK BLUES: Please excuse a personal grumble. If you're not in the mood for one, skip to the last paragraph. Regular readers will recall my travails with my new iBook in February. I lost a week of access to it, but the defective unit was promptly replaced and I had no real complaint. Well, the story continues, and becomes less happy. From mid-February to the end of April, thinks seemed to go fine, and I got a lot of use out the machine, including on a long trip abroad. But at the end of April, everything changed. The iBook broke down twice in rapid succession and had to be sent to a repair center for two distinct, mysterious hardware problems. I had it back and working for a week in May, but otherwise it has been either broken, in transit, or at the service center. Most recently it arrived at the service center on May 24th, two weeks ago yesterday. On that day I got the message "On hold - Part on order (24-May-2006)." And there it has remained for the last fortnight. On Monday morning of this week I called the support number and they promised me they would give my case high priority status and said the part should be in within 24 hours. That was almost three days ago. The message "On hold - Part on order (24-May-2006)" remains on my Mail-in Repair Status page and no one has contacted me to tell me what is going on. To put this in context, I have been using Apple computers for almost 21 years. They have generally been reliable and trouble free. The move from the Apple operating system to the Unix-based System X a few years ago was a bit rocky, but nearly all the problems have been ironed out with version 10.4. I have had an eMac desktop machine for more than three years and, apart from a stretch where it had slowness problems that eventually were resolved, it has been reliable and I have been happy with it. And I can add to the plus side that the technical people I have talked to in the last several months have been helpful and polite and reasonably knowledgeable. Also, Apple has shipped the computer back and forth to the repair center without charge. There's the plus side. But the minus side is that this my second iBook unit in less than four months; I've had this one in working order only for about a week since the beginning of May because it has had critical hardware breakdowns twice; and the second time appears to be nowhere near resolution even after the machine has been at the service center for more than two weeks. I bought the thing to take with me to conferences and I have one today to which I intended to take it. I can't. The most charitable face I can put on this is that Apple's repair centers must be seriously understaffed. And it's hard not to worry that an employee who was working on my computer has quit or been fired and it is sitting on a shelf or in a box somewhere and no one remembers it. I want to cut Apple all the slack I can, but I'm getting really fed up. Until now I would have recommended Apple computers without hesitation because of their stability and reliability. Now I'm not so sure. Stability and reliability are not what I've been seeing lately. By the way, is my recent experience with Apple unusual? I would be interested in hearing from Apple-using readers whether their experience in the last year or so has been good or bad. Please let me know if it has been either. It's possible that I have just had bad luck and this case is not representative. I hope so. To make it all perfect, Blogger suddenly went belly up and was "Down for Maintenance" all yesterday evening "due to an unexpected problem." This post was written then, but I'm just putting it up this morning before I run to catch a train. I'll keep you posted on what happens with the iBook. I'll be in Edinburgh all day today at the Scottish Universities' day-conference for postgraduates in Divinity and Theology. I won't have a portable computer with me (grrr...) so additional blogging, if any, will have to wait until this evening. posted by Jim Davila | 7:18 AM Wednesday, June 07, 2006 LOU H. SILBERMAN - 1914-2006. I am very sorry to note that Professor Lou H. Silberman died yesterday, two and a half weeks before his 92nd birthday. There is an obituary here. May his memory be for a blessing. (Via the Agade list.) posted by Jim Davila | 2:48 PM A SECOND TEMPLE ERA SITE has reportedly been located in modern Bethel (Khirbet Kafr Mer). Yitzak Sapir translates a Hebrew article from Arutz Sheva on his Hebrew Bible and ANE History Lists Commentary blog. (Via the Agade list.) posted by Jim Davila | 2:02 PM AN OBITUARY FOR SIMON PARKER has appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, although it seems to have been published previously in the Boston Globe: Dr. Simon Parker -- professor of Hebrew Bibleposted by Jim Davila | 9:26 AM "BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY," it seems, is not dead yet. Not by a good bit. Bar Ilan promotes biblical archeologyUPDATE: From various sources, I see that Professor Aren Maeir has a blog post up in which he indicates that he is misquoted in this article. It is demoralizing to realize just how often this happens. posted by Jim Davila | 9:09 AM HEROD'S HARBOR is now open to scuba-diving visitors: Diving into history in King Herod's harborposted by Jim Davila | 9:04 AM Tuesday, June 06, 2006 MORE ON THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS EXHIBITION coming to Kansas City: A look at sacred pages from the pastposted by Jim Davila | 9:18 AM Monday, June 05, 2006 NOW YOU CAN TEXT YOUR FRIENDS IN ETHIOPIC: Feedelix Wireless Inc last week announced the release of FeedelSMS, its first mobile software product for Ethiopic languages. Feedelix provides the first and only existing solution in the market to serve its millions of Ethiopic language users around the world.posted by Jim Davila | 9:25 AM NOW PAKISTAN: 'Da Vinci Code' is banned in PakistanMy previous commentary applies here too. posted by Jim Davila | 9:22 AM CATCHY HEADLINE for a truly absurd topic: Apocalypse tomorrow? 666 arrivesWhat will people think of next? David Meadows has pointed out that if we go with the manuscript variant "616" in Revelation 13:18, the big day ought to have been on June 1st. And that's just in the American system. In Britain it ought to have been January 6th. [British date now corrected, thanks to a note from Mark Goodacre.] posted by Jim Davila | 9:15 AM Sunday, June 04, 2006 I GUESS IT'S NOT OFFICIAL -- YET. A few days ago I reported that the Egyptian Government had officially banned the Da Vinci Code movie. It seems I misread the article. The movie has not been released, but there is not yet an official decision to ban it. Sorry for the error. Egyptian police seize 2,000 pirated 'Da Vinci Code' DVDs, Christians want film bannedposted by Jim Davila | 7:44 AM |
|
|||