NEIL ALTMAN has duped yet another newspaper (the Philadelphia Bulletin) into taking his ridiculous notions about the Dead Sea Scrolls seriously.

Challenging History: The Dead Sea Scrolls
By: Neil Altman, For The Bulletin
09/21/2007

[...]

From the editor's note:

Since their discovery nearly half a century ago, the scrolls and the identity of the nearby settlement have been of great scholarly and public interest as well as heated controversy. Why were the scrolls hidden in the caves? Who placed them there? Who lived in Qumran? Were its inhabitants responsible for the scrolls and their presence in the caves? Of what significance are the scrolls to Judaism and Christianity?
In this article, Neil Altman, who has devoted much of his life to studying the scrolls, examines the latest evidence regarding the age and authenticity of these controversial artifacts. While his conclusions are not accepted by everyone in the field, they bring up compelling questions surrounding some of the most famed group of documents in human history.

The Dead Sea Scrolls, the crown jewels of biblical scholarship, have been guarded for 60 years.
Soon after the existence of the scrolls came to light, a scholarly debate broke out over whether the writings were indeed pre-Christian. Though it was commonly accepted that the scrolls were ancient, many respected scholars had begun to argue that the texts were much more recent in origin.
In short order, a scholarly elite emerged and took possession of the artifacts, keeping them hidden from scrutiny. Recently, that group has been challenged to bring the scrolls to the public for closer examination.
Now, there is accumulating and compelling evidence that undermines everything we originally thought about the scrolls - including an explosive finding in China that suggests these historic texts date from medieval times.

I'm not going to waste time discussing this article. Instead I'll just refer you to my past comments on Altman's erroneous arguments and his twisting of the words of real scholars here, here, here, here, here, and here. But I note that in this article Altman cites the work of Greg Doudna to support the absurd idea that the Scrolls are medieval. Greg thinks no such thing and would not be happy to be associated with this notion.

I'll say it again: Altman and his friends are making fools of a good many journalists and newspaper editors, who don't have sense enough to vet their claims independently with real specialists.