THE PERSEPOLIS CUNEIFORM ARCHIVE CONTROVERSY (i.e., whether the archive should be confiscated by the US Government as compensation for terrorism sponsered by the Iranian Government) is the subject of a long and thorough article in
The Herald News, MA.
FOCUS: Terrorism impacting archaeology, 02-22-09
The Herald News
Posted Feb 20, 2009 @ 05:40 PM
CHICAGO — The professor opens a cardboard box and gingerly picks up a few hunks of dried clay — dust-baked relics that offer a glimpse into the long-lost world of the Persian empire that spanned a continent 2,500 years ago.
Matt Stolper has spent decades studying these palm-sized bits of ancient history. Tens of thousands of them. They’re like a jigsaw puzzle. A single piece offers a tantalizing clue. Together, the big picture is scholarly bliss: a window into Persepolis, the capital of the Persian empire looted and burned by Alexander the Great.
The collection — on loan for decades to the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute — is known as the Persepolis Fortification Archive. These are, to put it simply, bureaucratic records. But in their own way, they tell a story of rank and privilege, of deserters and generals, of life in what was once the largest empire on earth.
For Stolper — temporary caretaker of the tablets — these are priceless treasures.
For others, they may one day be payment for a terrible deed.
In an extraordinary battle unfolding slowly in federal court here, several survivors of a suicide bombing in Jerusalem in 1997 sued the government of Iran, accusing it of being complicit in the attack. They won a $412 million default judgment from a judge in Washington, D.C., and when their lawyer began looking for places to collect, he turned to the past.
[...]
This is an excellent account that gives a sympathetic and (as far as I can tell) accurate presentation of both sides of this heartrending controversy, with full attention to the evil actions of Hamas and the Iranian regime, the horrendous suffering of the terrorism victims, the immense historical importance of the archive, and the worrisome implications of using it for compensation. It's hard to excerpt, but here's the conclusion:
No one knows how much the tablets (there are 10,000 to 12,000 useful pieces) would fetch on the open market. Some academics believe it would be a mere fraction of the enormous judgments; others think no institution would even bid on them considering the legal tug-of-war.
Strachman, however, maintains he has been contacted by interested museums who want to expand their collections. He says he has no intention of trying to sell them commercially — something he says would be “absolutely inappropriate.”
He has sued the Field Museum in Chicago, too, as well as the Harvard museums and the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston for other Persian artifacts. In those cases, lawyers deny the items belong to the government of Iran.
Strachman also is seeking a list of all Iranian assets in the United States.
As this case works its way through the courts, Stein, head of the Oriental Institute, worries about broader implications.
“If we open up the Pandora’s box ... and sell other countries’ cultural property, how long before they do the same to us?” he asks. “It would have a deadly, chilling effect on any kinds of cultural exchanges in the future.”
Gerstenblith, the DePaul professor, agrees. The bombing survivors clearly deserve compensation, she says, adding that she wouldn’t object if land or bank assets were at stake. “Money is money,” she says. “But cultural objects are completely different.”
Seven decades after these ancient records arrived by ship, a very modern-day debate over terrorism now leaves them in a legal limbo. It may take years more before their fate — and their home — is finally determined.
“I think and have to hope that common sense is going to prevail,” Stein says. “They ultimately are the property of the people of Iran and they belong back there.”
It is a relief to hear at least that one set of plaintiffs have no intention of selling the tablets to private collectors, although if they win the case, I doubt that they would be required to stand by that, and as the article notes, museums may hold off from getting involved in the controversy. But even these plaintiffs do not promise not to break up the collection. And the article notes that the lawyer for another set of plaintiffs has made this menacing statement:
Another lawyer is trying to seize the Persepolis collection and other Iranian assets to compensate more than 150 families of 241 U.S. service members killed in a suicide bombing of a Marines barracks in Beirut in 1983.
The families hope to collect a $2.6 billion default judgment against Iran, which has been blamed for supporting the militant group, Hezbollah, believed responsible for the Beirut attack. A special measure passed in Congress last year made it easier for families to receive compensation.
“If Iran wants to protect these things ... they’re going to have to do something to pay their judgments,” says Thomas Fortune Fay, the lawyer. “Maybe they’ll all end up on coffee tables around the country.”
I think this demonstrates that the precedent of seizing antiquities as compensation would be exceedingly unfortunate and could well be exploited by people such as Mr. Fay, who have no scruples against breaking up and selling such collections to private collectors.
Read it all.
Background
here.
