To uphold the tradition of philology, I will pick a nit:
Still, I would like to see the refutation published in a peer-review journal in more detail than has been presented so far.
Um, am I missing something or isn't the normal order for something to be *published* in a peer-reviewed journal before being *refuted* in a peer-reviewed journal?
Touch�. Can we have both maybe? Or else forget about the whole thing?